Skip to main content

I Think You Can

  Robert Rosenthal came to teachers with a new test called the Harvard Test of Inflected Acquisition. This test he informed the instructors could accurately predict kids that would excel in the coming year. The test was administered and the teachers were given the names of potentially high-achieving students.  Rosenthal expressed to them that these kids were special and that even if they might not done well in the past they showed unusual potential for growth. 

 

The test proved itself right. Those students it selected scored better and improved more. The 1st graders gained 27 IQ points as for only 12 for the rest of the class. In 2nd grade, the potentially high achievers gained 17 points versus only 7 by the rest of the class.

  The result might be right but the test wasn’t.  Rosenthal selected the kids at random.  Nothing was different about them.

  What really changed was how they were viewed by their teachers. Instead of seeing them as average, they viewed them as special. And that viewpoint changed how they treated them.

 The teachers treated these kids kinder with more warmth, gave them more learning material, and called on them more in class. When the students made a mistake, they gave them the benefit of doubt and were quicker to presume they needed better feedback. This change in how they were treated changed how they performed.

  I think this is akin to what Paul tells us in 2nd Corinthians 5:16-17:  “Therefore from now on we recognize no one according to the flesh; even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, yet now we know Him in this way no longer. Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come.”

  Instead of looking at people in the worldly, fleshy light, we should see them in the way Christ does as one with the potential for growth. That will change how we treat others and that can change what they become! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I Know All Those Words, But That Sentence Makes No Sense To Me

  Let’s say you travel back in time six hundred years or so.  Luckily, you happen across a fellow that speaks English.  Upon hearing your tale, he describes you as nice, smart, and handsome.  Wouldn’t you feel good?   You shouldn’t.  As Sol Steinmetz in his book, Semantics Antics , explains; Nice originally meant someone who was foolish, ignorant, senseless, or absurd (middle English 1300). Smart for the first 300 years of its use meant causing pain, sharp, cutting, or severe, a sense that survives in the idiom "smart as a whip.” Handsome wasn’t complimentary. When coined around 1425, it just meant easily handled; it didn’t have its current positive connotation until 1590.   You might think he said you were a kind, intelligent, good looking bloke, when in reality he said you were a foolish pain easily dealt with.   Words have an annoying habit of changing meaning over time in the same language and it becomes even more compli...

Master Your Self

  In a contest for the toughest president of the United States, it would be hard to go against Theodore Roosevelt.  He was known for his “manly” pursuits hunting big game, climbing the Matterhorn, participating in boxing match while president. (These weren’t play fights, he lost the vision on one eye because of them!)  Once before he was about to give a speech an assassin shot him in the chest.  Roosevelt refused to go to a hospital and insisted on giving his speech, still wearing his blood-soaked shirt!   Teddy might have become tough but he wasn’t born that way.  He was a sickly child that suffered from severe asthma that almost proved fatal.  As was a young boy, doctors discovered that he had a weak heart, and advised him to get a desk job and not strain himself.  He was homeschooled because of his many illnesses and spent most of his time indoors.   But then as a teen his father, whom Teddy Roosevelt revered, told his son, “ ...

Why Does A Lion Tamer Use a Chair?

  Ok, I know you have seen the image. A lion tamer enters in the cage of the beast and forces it to obey his commands using a whip, a gun and a chair. Now you can see how the whip and gun could come in handy but you might be wondering why a chair would intimidate an animal as powerful as a lion? Clyde Beatty taming a lion with a chair   It's not that the lion is afraid of the chair -- it's that the lion is confused by the chair. Cats are single-minded, and the points of the chair's four legs bobbing around confuse the lion enough that it loses its train of thought. Casually put, the chair distracts the lion from wanting to claw the lion tamer's face off. The powerful creature could destroy the chair in moment’s notice but instead it is distracted into submission.  It’s not too much different than how Satan controls us today. By the power of God we could overcome anything that he would use to subdue us. We can overcome the evil one (1 st John 2:13-14). ...