Membership Has It’s Privileges

It’s a strange phenomenon that I have seen since my first days in ministry. It goes something like this: A person will slowly and habitually miss church services, until the point they lose any connection to the body. Then some trial will come along, an illness, a death, a family or spiritual struggle that will make them long for the support that comes from that body. Since they have been absent for so long, the chain of communication is weak and the support they desire does not come or at least come quickly enough. They then lash out at the body for being uncaring about them and abandoning them. But the body didn’t leave them, they left the body.

I think people often get the order of need confused when it comes to the body. While a body doesn’t function to its fullness without a given part, it still can survive. But take any body part and remove it from the rest of the body it will die. The body suffers if it is missing an eye but the eye outside the body will die. Missing the assembling doesn’t harm the body as much as it will harm you!

In Hebrews 10:23-25 we read:

“Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful; and let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds, not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near.”

If we continually miss the gatherings of the church, how can we be holding fast to our faith? Who will encourage us? Who will push us to continue doing what is right? Being outside the body mean we are not getting the things we need to survive.

Yes the church needs you but let me remind you, you need it more. It is not possible for any of us to remain faithful without the support of the rest of the body. When we are faithful in attendance, it allows the body to support us. When we remove ourselves from it, don't be surprised if you lack from what it provides.

Comments

I Know All Those Words, But That Sentence Makes No Sense To Me

Let’s say you travel back in time six hundred years or so. Luckily, you happen across a fellow that speaks English. Upon hearing your tale, he describes you as nice, smart, and handsome. Wouldn’t you feel good? You shouldn’t. As Sol Steinmetz in his book, Semantics Antics , explains; Nice originally meant someone who was foolish, ignorant, senseless, or absurd (middle English 1300). Smart for the first 300 years of its use meant causing pain, sharp, cutting, or severe, a sense that survives in the idiom "smart as a whip.” Handsome wasn’t complimentary. When coined around 1425, it just meant easily handled; it didn’t have its current positive connotation until 1590. You might think he said you were a kind, intelligent, good looking bloke, when in reality he said you were a foolish pain easily dealt with. Words have an annoying habit of changing meaning over time in the same language and it becomes even more compli...

Master Your Self

In a contest for the toughest president of the United States, it would be hard to go against Theodore Roosevelt. He was known for his “manly” pursuits hunting big game, climbing the Matterhorn, participating in boxing match while president. (These weren’t play fights, he lost the vision on one eye because of them!) Once before he was about to give a speech an assassin shot him in the chest. Roosevelt refused to go to a hospital and insisted on giving his speech, still wearing his blood-soaked shirt! Teddy might have become tough but he wasn’t born that way. He was a sickly child that suffered from severe asthma that almost proved fatal. As was a young boy, doctors discovered that he had a weak heart, and advised him to get a desk job and not strain himself. He was homeschooled because of his many illnesses and spent most of his time indoors. But then as a teen his father, whom Teddy Roosevelt revered, told his son, “ ...

Why Does A Lion Tamer Use a Chair?

Ok, I know you have seen the image. A lion tamer enters in the cage of the beast and forces it to obey his commands using a whip, a gun and a chair. Now you can see how the whip and gun could come in handy but you might be wondering why a chair would intimidate an animal as powerful as a lion? Clyde Beatty taming a lion with a chair It's not that the lion is afraid of the chair -- it's that the lion is confused by the chair. Cats are single-minded, and the points of the chair's four legs bobbing around confuse the lion enough that it loses its train of thought. Casually put, the chair distracts the lion from wanting to claw the lion tamer's face off. The powerful creature could destroy the chair in moment’s notice but instead it is distracted into submission. It’s not too much different than how Satan controls us today. By the power of God we could overcome anything that he would use to subdue us. We can overcome the evil one (1 st John 2:13-14). ...

Ecclesiastes 12:10

Search This Blog