Skip to main content

Monday Morning Scattershooting


Monday Morning Scattershooting while wondering if Plato says that the unexamined life is not worth living, what if the examined life turns out to be a clunker as well?



    I happen to like comic books.  And yes from time to time I have been known to slip a comic book quote in my lessons.  So don’t think too low of me when I tell you one of my principals of ministry comes from Batman.  When Batman is asked to be part of the Justice League he agrees on one condition, “Gotham comes first”.  Now being that the Justice League deals with worldwide crisis and Gotham is in the world so one could argue that he could be doing things with the Justice League all the time and still be taking care of Gotham, but that isn't what he meant.  
  “Gotham comes 1st” means that his primary role is Gotham’s protector and he won’t let other thing keep him from that role no matter how important.  I try to keep a “Gotham comes 1st mentality in regards to my home congregation.  There are lots of good works that I as a preacher can be involved in.  I will try to be a help to them as long as “Gotham comes 1st”.  Many preachers get so involved in other things (gospel meeting work, writing, boards, higher education, etc…) that they neglect the work at home.  Do those things but make sure that your primary responsibilities are taken care of.  You can’t fulfill your ministry in absentia. 


    I often times hear people justify the baptism of very young person by saying if they have doubts later they can just get re-baptized. There is no such thing as re-baptism. Either you were baptized according to scripture with the pledge of a good conscience towards God, or you just got wet with no spiritual consequences. We are not doing our young people any favors by giving them reason to doubt their conversion. 
   If a young person desires to be baptized, I ask them to fill out a question and answer book on the subject. If they can’t commitment to a little homework, how can they then make a lifelong commitment to Christ? Then I try to ask them question that are not the ones they are used to. If a kid has set through services for ten years, there is a good chance they can tell you all about the steps of salvation. But they need to know more than just repeated phrases.  Rob Whitacre tells the following story to show that difference:
 “Johnny,” said the preacher, “I want you to listen to this story very carefully.”
Let’s say you, a baby, and I took a car ride together. During our trip there was a terrible accident and we all died. Where do you think the baby would go and why? Where do you think I would go and why? Where do you think you would go and why?
Each of these questions are designed to make an application of sin and salvation as taught in the Word of God. These questions about Johnny make it personal. Anyone can repeat facts, but only when one understands the facts, can one answer those questions correctly.

  Only if the child has a complete understanding of the decision they are making, do I baptize them. After I do, I ask them to write themselves a letter explaining to themselves the exact reason why they made this choice. I tell them to be completely honest and I will never look at the letter. I will seal it up and keep it filled away. If they ever have any doubts, I will send it to them so they can read exactly what they were thinking.  I've seen many a kid anguish over their salvation because they look back unsure of the commitment they made. This can help them know what they were thinking.

    Finally, a man is sitting on a bench next to a dog in the grass, when a younger man walks by and asks him if his dog bites.  The man says, “"No, my dog never bites anyone."  The younger man reaches down to pet the dog, when all of a sudden; the dog lashes out and bites his hand. "Ow! What the wrong with you, screams the younger man, "You said your dog didn't bite!".  The man responded, "...That's not my dog."
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I Know All Those Words, But That Sentence Makes No Sense To Me

  Let’s say you travel back in time six hundred years or so.  Luckily, you happen across a fellow that speaks English.  Upon hearing your tale, he describes you as nice, smart, and handsome.  Wouldn’t you feel good?   You shouldn’t.  As Sol Steinmetz in his book, Semantics Antics , explains; Nice originally meant someone who was foolish, ignorant, senseless, or absurd (middle English 1300). Smart for the first 300 years of its use meant causing pain, sharp, cutting, or severe, a sense that survives in the idiom "smart as a whip.” Handsome wasn’t complimentary. When coined around 1425, it just meant easily handled; it didn’t have its current positive connotation until 1590.   You might think he said you were a kind, intelligent, good looking bloke, when in reality he said you were a foolish pain easily dealt with.   Words have an annoying habit of changing meaning over time in the same language and it becomes even more compli...
Post a Comment
Read more

Master Your Self

  In a contest for the toughest president of the United States, it would be hard to go against Theodore Roosevelt.  He was known for his “manly” pursuits hunting big game, climbing the Matterhorn, participating in boxing match while president. (These weren’t play fights, he lost the vision on one eye because of them!)  Once before he was about to give a speech an assassin shot him in the chest.  Roosevelt refused to go to a hospital and insisted on giving his speech, still wearing his blood-soaked shirt!   Teddy might have become tough but he wasn’t born that way.  He was a sickly child that suffered from severe asthma that almost proved fatal.  As was a young boy, doctors discovered that he had a weak heart, and advised him to get a desk job and not strain himself.  He was homeschooled because of his many illnesses and spent most of his time indoors.   But then as a teen his father, whom Teddy Roosevelt revered, told his son, “ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Does A Lion Tamer Use a Chair?

  Ok, I know you have seen the image. A lion tamer enters in the cage of the beast and forces it to obey his commands using a whip, a gun and a chair. Now you can see how the whip and gun could come in handy but you might be wondering why a chair would intimidate an animal as powerful as a lion? Clyde Beatty taming a lion with a chair   It's not that the lion is afraid of the chair -- it's that the lion is confused by the chair. Cats are single-minded, and the points of the chair's four legs bobbing around confuse the lion enough that it loses its train of thought. Casually put, the chair distracts the lion from wanting to claw the lion tamer's face off. The powerful creature could destroy the chair in moment’s notice but instead it is distracted into submission.  It’s not too much different than how Satan controls us today. By the power of God we could overcome anything that he would use to subdue us. We can overcome the evil one (1 st John 2:13-14). ...
Post a Comment
Read more