Speaking Beyond Your Authority

Tensions in East Germany on November 9^th, 1989 were at an all-time high. With the collapsing Soviet Union, the puppet government in East Germany was having trouble controlling the population that was desperate to leave the communist country. Nowhere was the pressure building more than in East Berlin a city literally divided by a wall.

The ruling party, in order to dampen the fervor, agreed to a temporary arrangement to allow emigration. The idea was to bury the issue in legal hoops and red tape. A dense document was to be read by the media spokesman Guenter Schabowski at a press release. For an hour he read the stiltedly-worded regulations out in full, the first time he had ever seen them. At the end, he has surprised when a reporter asked when the regulation would go into effect. He didn’t know so he responded “as far as I know… this is immediate, without delay”.

That is all it took. Soon people were flooding to the border crossing. Attempt to convince the crowd to wait till the next day were ignored. By midnight the gates were overrun and the Berlin wall was no more. After 28 years, a botched announcement by a tired and partly informed official changed history, even if that wasn’t what he was supposed to say.

That’s why we need to be careful when we speak for God. I can say some things for God because he has told me to say them. But yet speaking from God isn’t the same a speaking for God. Too many religious folks make claims that are not what He has said or not fully what He has said. I can speak of the judgments of God but I’m not authorized to make those judgments. We need to speak only what know and not on what we think.

It’s sad to think on judgment day there will be those that think they have access thru the gates of heaven but don’t because someone misspoke to them God’s will. Let’s never speak beyond our authority in matters regarding God.

Comments

I Know All Those Words, But That Sentence Makes No Sense To Me

Let’s say you travel back in time six hundred years or so. Luckily, you happen across a fellow that speaks English. Upon hearing your tale, he describes you as nice, smart, and handsome. Wouldn’t you feel good? You shouldn’t. As Sol Steinmetz in his book, Semantics Antics , explains; Nice originally meant someone who was foolish, ignorant, senseless, or absurd (middle English 1300). Smart for the first 300 years of its use meant causing pain, sharp, cutting, or severe, a sense that survives in the idiom "smart as a whip.” Handsome wasn’t complimentary. When coined around 1425, it just meant easily handled; it didn’t have its current positive connotation until 1590. You might think he said you were a kind, intelligent, good looking bloke, when in reality he said you were a foolish pain easily dealt with. Words have an annoying habit of changing meaning over time in the same language and it becomes even more compli...

Master Your Self

In a contest for the toughest president of the United States, it would be hard to go against Theodore Roosevelt. He was known for his “manly” pursuits hunting big game, climbing the Matterhorn, participating in boxing match while president. (These weren’t play fights, he lost the vision on one eye because of them!) Once before he was about to give a speech an assassin shot him in the chest. Roosevelt refused to go to a hospital and insisted on giving his speech, still wearing his blood-soaked shirt! Teddy might have become tough but he wasn’t born that way. He was a sickly child that suffered from severe asthma that almost proved fatal. As was a young boy, doctors discovered that he had a weak heart, and advised him to get a desk job and not strain himself. He was homeschooled because of his many illnesses and spent most of his time indoors. But then as a teen his father, whom Teddy Roosevelt revered, told his son, “ ...

Why Does A Lion Tamer Use a Chair?

Ok, I know you have seen the image. A lion tamer enters in the cage of the beast and forces it to obey his commands using a whip, a gun and a chair. Now you can see how the whip and gun could come in handy but you might be wondering why a chair would intimidate an animal as powerful as a lion? Clyde Beatty taming a lion with a chair It's not that the lion is afraid of the chair -- it's that the lion is confused by the chair. Cats are single-minded, and the points of the chair's four legs bobbing around confuse the lion enough that it loses its train of thought. Casually put, the chair distracts the lion from wanting to claw the lion tamer's face off. The powerful creature could destroy the chair in moment’s notice but instead it is distracted into submission. It’s not too much different than how Satan controls us today. By the power of God we could overcome anything that he would use to subdue us. We can overcome the evil one (1 st John 2:13-14). ...

Ecclesiastes 12:10

Search This Blog