Skip to main content

Two Sons, Ten Coins & Ninety Nine Sheep



  Luke 15 is the ‘lost’ chapter of the Bible.

  It isn’t missing from the scripture but rather it consists of three parables that deal with lost things. A shepherd that has lost a sheep, a woman who has lost a treasure, a father that has lost a son. The chapter emphasizes the joy one has in finding that which was lost because of it of how dear it should be to us.

  It starts however with a different attitude.

Now all the tax collectors and the sinners were coming near Him to listen to Him. Both the Pharisees and the scribes began to grumble, saying, "This man receives sinners and eats with them."
Luke 15:1-2

  The ‘holy’ people couldn’t help but look down on Jesus because of his audience. Jesus was a friend to the very people a prophet should know better than to associate with. So Jesus attempts to adjust their attitude. In each parable, the focus isn’t what you have but what is lost. Those ‘older brothers’ who think they are better and have little need for the lost, don’t understand God’s plan or Jesus mission.

  So what is the lesson for us? Churches that ‘happy where they are at’ might be in need of an attitude adjustment. Rather than just condemning sin, we need to be seeking the lost. Staying put, hoarding what we have isn’t keeping us in the will of the Father. We can be ‘at home’ and still be lost. We must go with the Gospel. Jesus mission should be our mission, to seek and save the lost.

  There is “more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who need no repentance”. Can we really be pleasing God if we aren’t working to make that happen?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I Know All Those Words, But That Sentence Makes No Sense To Me

  Let’s say you travel back in time six hundred years or so.  Luckily, you happen across a fellow that speaks English.  Upon hearing your tale, he describes you as nice, smart, and handsome.  Wouldn’t you feel good?   You shouldn’t.  As Sol Steinmetz in his book, Semantics Antics , explains; Nice originally meant someone who was foolish, ignorant, senseless, or absurd (middle English 1300). Smart for the first 300 years of its use meant causing pain, sharp, cutting, or severe, a sense that survives in the idiom "smart as a whip.” Handsome wasn’t complimentary. When coined around 1425, it just meant easily handled; it didn’t have its current positive connotation until 1590.   You might think he said you were a kind, intelligent, good looking bloke, when in reality he said you were a foolish pain easily dealt with.   Words have an annoying habit of changing meaning over time in the same language and it becomes even more compli...

Master Your Self

  In a contest for the toughest president of the United States, it would be hard to go against Theodore Roosevelt.  He was known for his “manly” pursuits hunting big game, climbing the Matterhorn, participating in boxing match while president. (These weren’t play fights, he lost the vision on one eye because of them!)  Once before he was about to give a speech an assassin shot him in the chest.  Roosevelt refused to go to a hospital and insisted on giving his speech, still wearing his blood-soaked shirt!   Teddy might have become tough but he wasn’t born that way.  He was a sickly child that suffered from severe asthma that almost proved fatal.  As was a young boy, doctors discovered that he had a weak heart, and advised him to get a desk job and not strain himself.  He was homeschooled because of his many illnesses and spent most of his time indoors.   But then as a teen his father, whom Teddy Roosevelt revered, told his son, “ ...

Until Midnight

    In Acts 20, there is the tragicomic event surrounding a young man by the name of Eutychus. He did what a lot of folks before and after him did, he fell asleep during a sermon. Unfortunately, he was setting in in the third story window at the time. So instead of nodding off and hitting the pew in front of him, he fell to his death. The good news was the apostle Paul was delivering the sermon and had the ability to bring him back.       I don’t know, however, if we can judge Eutychus too harshly. The sermon had gone on till midnight. Paul wouldn’t finish it up till daybreak. That’s a long lesson. I know some folks that might want to jump out of a window if I had a lesson that long, yet these Christians wanted to be there to hear Paul.   Don’t get me wrong, I’m not pushing for all night sermons but I think we might need to adopt these folks' dedication. They knew that Paul was only in town for a limited time only and they were determined to ...