Those That Are Sick Of Our Church

You hear people make the statements; “I want Jesus but not the church”, “Jesus is my personal savior but I’m not into organized religion”, "I find my spirituality in nature, not in a pew with other people". It’s an emphasis that while Jesus is desirable his church is not.

Can you have one without the other?

Consider what is said in Acts 9:

As he was traveling, it happened that he was approaching Damascus, and suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him; and he fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, "Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?"

Acts 9:3-4

Here Saul is confronted about his actions. The Voice from heaven asks why are you persecuting Me? Saul is confused. The Voice from heaven must be the Lord but when has he persecuted the Lord? He was doing what he was doing for the Lord (Acts 26:9, Philippians 3:6)! So he ask, “Who are You, Lord?”. The response; "I am Jesus whom you are persecuting".

So Paul had been persecuting Jesus, but when had he been persecuting him? Jesus was in heaven, having ascended there before Saul is ever in the picture.

How had he done it?

To find the answer all we have to do is go back to the first of Acts 9:

Now Saul, still breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the Lord, went to the high priest, and asked for letters from him to the synagogues at Damascus, so that if he found any belonging to the Way, both men and women, he might bring them bound to Jerusalem.

Acts 9:1-2

Saul had been attacking the disciples, the Way, the church. You see in attacking Jesus’ people you are attacking him. Go after a man’s bride and you are launching an attack on him (Ephesians 5:23). If you are dismissing the church of Christ, you are dismissing Jesus.

Before we are quick to attack the church we need to remember that in doing so we may just find ourselves picking a fight with the Lord. Jesus came to establish his church (Matthew 6:18), he bought it with his blood (Acts 20:28), it is his body (Colossians 1:18). Should we be so quick to dismiss what so clearly is important to him?

Comments

I Know All Those Words, But That Sentence Makes No Sense To Me

Let’s say you travel back in time six hundred years or so. Luckily, you happen across a fellow that speaks English. Upon hearing your tale, he describes you as nice, smart, and handsome. Wouldn’t you feel good? You shouldn’t. As Sol Steinmetz in his book, Semantics Antics , explains; Nice originally meant someone who was foolish, ignorant, senseless, or absurd (middle English 1300). Smart for the first 300 years of its use meant causing pain, sharp, cutting, or severe, a sense that survives in the idiom "smart as a whip.” Handsome wasn’t complimentary. When coined around 1425, it just meant easily handled; it didn’t have its current positive connotation until 1590. You might think he said you were a kind, intelligent, good looking bloke, when in reality he said you were a foolish pain easily dealt with. Words have an annoying habit of changing meaning over time in the same language and it becomes even more compli...

Master Your Self

In a contest for the toughest president of the United States, it would be hard to go against Theodore Roosevelt. He was known for his “manly” pursuits hunting big game, climbing the Matterhorn, participating in boxing match while president. (These weren’t play fights, he lost the vision on one eye because of them!) Once before he was about to give a speech an assassin shot him in the chest. Roosevelt refused to go to a hospital and insisted on giving his speech, still wearing his blood-soaked shirt! Teddy might have become tough but he wasn’t born that way. He was a sickly child that suffered from severe asthma that almost proved fatal. As was a young boy, doctors discovered that he had a weak heart, and advised him to get a desk job and not strain himself. He was homeschooled because of his many illnesses and spent most of his time indoors. But then as a teen his father, whom Teddy Roosevelt revered, told his son, “ ...

Why Does A Lion Tamer Use a Chair?

Ok, I know you have seen the image. A lion tamer enters in the cage of the beast and forces it to obey his commands using a whip, a gun and a chair. Now you can see how the whip and gun could come in handy but you might be wondering why a chair would intimidate an animal as powerful as a lion? Clyde Beatty taming a lion with a chair It's not that the lion is afraid of the chair -- it's that the lion is confused by the chair. Cats are single-minded, and the points of the chair's four legs bobbing around confuse the lion enough that it loses its train of thought. Casually put, the chair distracts the lion from wanting to claw the lion tamer's face off. The powerful creature could destroy the chair in moment’s notice but instead it is distracted into submission. It’s not too much different than how Satan controls us today. By the power of God we could overcome anything that he would use to subdue us. We can overcome the evil one (1 st John 2:13-14). ...

Ecclesiastes 12:10

Search This Blog