A Work Some Else Does

You will often hear from some that baptism isn’t required for salvation since baptism is a work and we are not saved by works (Ephesians 2:8-9). Since the Bible does say that baptism saves us (1^st Peter 3:21, Mark 16:16, Acts 2:40-41), it must make us reconsider than line of logic.

So is baptism really a work?

Well, it is not a work of the law (Galatians 2:16) because 1^st Corinthians 6:11 tells us that our justification comes from the washing of baptism. So it not that kind of work, what kind of work is it? If anything we must do to be saved is “work” then we must not have to confess Jesus as Lord (Romans 10:9) or repent (Luke 13:3). To follow that train of logic we don’t even need to have faith since Jesus called it a work (John 6:28-29).

Oh, course this doesn’t make much sense. James clearly tells us that works must go alone with faith or faith doesn’t exist (James 2:24-26). So can we then come to a conclusion that baptism isn’t a work?

A preacher friend of mine recently pointed out something else to me that make help to clarify this issue. Most folks that claim baptism is a work, don’t think that repentance, belief or confession of Jesus is one. However consider my friends point, which one of those to we do and which one is done to us? No one can repent for me. No one would think anothers confess of Jesus could be substituted for my own. If you have faith, it doesn’t mean I do. These are act the individual does. That sounds more like a “work” than having another immerse you into water. You “do” those things, some else baptizes you.

The fact is none of these things are the “works” Paul is talking about in Ephesians 2:8-9. They are obedient responses to the grace of God. They are commands of God given for us to follow. They are how God gives us salvation. No command of the Lord can be ignored if you truly want to be pleasing to him. God work is done to us by our obedient faithful response.

Comments

I Know All Those Words, But That Sentence Makes No Sense To Me

Let’s say you travel back in time six hundred years or so. Luckily, you happen across a fellow that speaks English. Upon hearing your tale, he describes you as nice, smart, and handsome. Wouldn’t you feel good? You shouldn’t. As Sol Steinmetz in his book, Semantics Antics , explains; Nice originally meant someone who was foolish, ignorant, senseless, or absurd (middle English 1300). Smart for the first 300 years of its use meant causing pain, sharp, cutting, or severe, a sense that survives in the idiom "smart as a whip.” Handsome wasn’t complimentary. When coined around 1425, it just meant easily handled; it didn’t have its current positive connotation until 1590. You might think he said you were a kind, intelligent, good looking bloke, when in reality he said you were a foolish pain easily dealt with. Words have an annoying habit of changing meaning over time in the same language and it becomes even more compli...

Master Your Self

In a contest for the toughest president of the United States, it would be hard to go against Theodore Roosevelt. He was known for his “manly” pursuits hunting big game, climbing the Matterhorn, participating in boxing match while president. (These weren’t play fights, he lost the vision on one eye because of them!) Once before he was about to give a speech an assassin shot him in the chest. Roosevelt refused to go to a hospital and insisted on giving his speech, still wearing his blood-soaked shirt! Teddy might have become tough but he wasn’t born that way. He was a sickly child that suffered from severe asthma that almost proved fatal. As was a young boy, doctors discovered that he had a weak heart, and advised him to get a desk job and not strain himself. He was homeschooled because of his many illnesses and spent most of his time indoors. But then as a teen his father, whom Teddy Roosevelt revered, told his son, “ ...

Why Does A Lion Tamer Use a Chair?

Ok, I know you have seen the image. A lion tamer enters in the cage of the beast and forces it to obey his commands using a whip, a gun and a chair. Now you can see how the whip and gun could come in handy but you might be wondering why a chair would intimidate an animal as powerful as a lion? Clyde Beatty taming a lion with a chair It's not that the lion is afraid of the chair -- it's that the lion is confused by the chair. Cats are single-minded, and the points of the chair's four legs bobbing around confuse the lion enough that it loses its train of thought. Casually put, the chair distracts the lion from wanting to claw the lion tamer's face off. The powerful creature could destroy the chair in moment’s notice but instead it is distracted into submission. It’s not too much different than how Satan controls us today. By the power of God we could overcome anything that he would use to subdue us. We can overcome the evil one (1 st John 2:13-14). ...

Ecclesiastes 12:10

Search This Blog