Why The Preacher Should Not Be Baptizing

How's that for a shocking title! Well before you think I’ve lost, it let’s consider a verse;

I thank God that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius, so that no one would say you were baptized in my name.

1st Corinthians 1:14-15

Why in the world would Paul be thanking God for not baptizing people? Baptism clearly is very important in the Scriptures (Acts 2:38, 1^st Peter 3:21, Mark 16:16). Jesus commanded it, the apostles taught it and the text is replete with examples of it. So what he doing?

Paul here isn’t talking about the person needing to be baptized but the person doing the baptism. Baptism requires a person to be baptized and a person doing the baptism. Here Paul is making a point that it doesn’t require a special person to do the baptizing. This might be a shocking statement to us but it shouldn’t.

Jesus taught about baptism but he didn’t do the baptizing himself (John 4:1-2). Both Peter and Paul told people to be baptized but had others do the act (Acts 10:48, 1^st Corinthians 1:17). There is no Biblical requirement for an authorized “clergy” to baptize anyone.

Yet it seems we might have forgotten this concept. People feel the need to ‘call the preacher” when someone desires to be baptized. Folks might brag about the being baptized by a famous preacher. None of that matters or is necessary! Baptism is not about who we are baptized by who we are baptized into (Galatians 3:27).

Whenever someone is baptized I want to know about it and be there if at all possible. It is a time of rejoicing (Luke 15:10). But as a preacher I don’t have to be there or do it for it to matter. It might even be detrimental if it causes us to put faith in men rather than God.

Being baptized is what matters, not who is doing it.

Comments

I Know All Those Words, But That Sentence Makes No Sense To Me

Let’s say you travel back in time six hundred years or so. Luckily, you happen across a fellow that speaks English. Upon hearing your tale, he describes you as nice, smart, and handsome. Wouldn’t you feel good? You shouldn’t. As Sol Steinmetz in his book, Semantics Antics , explains; Nice originally meant someone who was foolish, ignorant, senseless, or absurd (middle English 1300). Smart for the first 300 years of its use meant causing pain, sharp, cutting, or severe, a sense that survives in the idiom "smart as a whip.” Handsome wasn’t complimentary. When coined around 1425, it just meant easily handled; it didn’t have its current positive connotation until 1590. You might think he said you were a kind, intelligent, good looking bloke, when in reality he said you were a foolish pain easily dealt with. Words have an annoying habit of changing meaning over time in the same language and it becomes even more compli...

Master Your Self

In a contest for the toughest president of the United States, it would be hard to go against Theodore Roosevelt. He was known for his “manly” pursuits hunting big game, climbing the Matterhorn, participating in boxing match while president. (These weren’t play fights, he lost the vision on one eye because of them!) Once before he was about to give a speech an assassin shot him in the chest. Roosevelt refused to go to a hospital and insisted on giving his speech, still wearing his blood-soaked shirt! Teddy might have become tough but he wasn’t born that way. He was a sickly child that suffered from severe asthma that almost proved fatal. As was a young boy, doctors discovered that he had a weak heart, and advised him to get a desk job and not strain himself. He was homeschooled because of his many illnesses and spent most of his time indoors. But then as a teen his father, whom Teddy Roosevelt revered, told his son, “ ...

Why Does A Lion Tamer Use a Chair?

Ok, I know you have seen the image. A lion tamer enters in the cage of the beast and forces it to obey his commands using a whip, a gun and a chair. Now you can see how the whip and gun could come in handy but you might be wondering why a chair would intimidate an animal as powerful as a lion? Clyde Beatty taming a lion with a chair It's not that the lion is afraid of the chair -- it's that the lion is confused by the chair. Cats are single-minded, and the points of the chair's four legs bobbing around confuse the lion enough that it loses its train of thought. Casually put, the chair distracts the lion from wanting to claw the lion tamer's face off. The powerful creature could destroy the chair in moment’s notice but instead it is distracted into submission. It’s not too much different than how Satan controls us today. By the power of God we could overcome anything that he would use to subdue us. We can overcome the evil one (1 st John 2:13-14). ...

Ecclesiastes 12:10

Search This Blog