Skip to main content

There I was looking for 1000 brown M&Ms or Ozzie wouldn’t go on stage



  In the music industry, it is not uncommon for acts to require a rider for any venue that is hosting one of their concerts. A rider is a set of requests or demands that a performer sets as criteria for performance. They can be anything from technical requirement for the audio to what kinds of drinks are served backstage.  Over the years some on the wilder request have surfaced that show how eccentric and vainglorious some acts can be. One that has been often referenced is the rock group Van Halen request for a bowl of M&Ms with all the brown candies removed from the rest. If any brown M&Ms were found with the food backstage, the band reserved the right to refuse to play, and still be fully compensated. Most people looked at it as the ultimate example of spoiled musicians, but really it was something else entirely.

  Van Halen was the biggest shows of their day, but they still would play in smaller markets that the bigger names usually didn’t visit. Their tour came with a massive amount of equipment and electrical requirements that many smaller venues would not be ready for. The technical needs of the show were spelled out in great detail in the concert rider. When Van Halen showed up, their crew didn’t have time to double-check if the prep work that had been done. If the wiring wasn't adequate, they could blow a fuse and the show would come to an abrupt halt. If the stage couldn't support the weight of the equipment, it could collapse, putting lives in danger. So buried in the middle of lengthy technical requirements they included the famous M&M clause. With a quick glance, they could tell how well the promoter has done their job. If there was no bowl of M&Ms, they hadn't read the whole contract. If there were brown M&Ms in the bowl, they had been sloppy in their preparations and they needed to check the setup. Every time, they found something wrong. If they found something they could fix, they might delay the show. If it was something serious that couldn't be corrected, the show was cancelled. The bowl of M&Ms served as a canary in the coal mine, warning them of pending danger.

  I wonder if God doesn't do the same thing with his people. Give us something simple enough to do but requires us to do it faithfully. It may make little sense to us but serves as a proof point to our faith. If we believe him we will do it, if we don’t we won’t. So when we try to bypass his commands, explain away the need to obey, dismiss the requirement as “legalism” and say God will be fine with not doing it, all we are doing is showing that we won’t be faithful. As Jesus said, “"He who is faithful in a very little thing is faithful also in much; and he who is unrighteous in a very little thing is unrighteous also in much. (Luke 16:10)

  So when Jesus says, “He who has believed and has been baptized shall be saved; but he who has disbelieved shall be condemned”, it sets up for us a choice. Listen, obey and show our faithfulness or ignore, do something else and prove to be unfaithful. Is baptism all there is to salvation? No, God's grace, Jesus sacrifice, the Gospel message, our faith and repentance, confession of Jesus, faithfulness all are important parts of salvation.  But baptism is also a part. And if we ignore it, or explain it away, or dismiss it as superfluous, than it is a great indicator that things are very wrong!
  God wants to have a relationship with us. He has given us written documentation to what he need for that to happen. Any change no matter how small is significant and is an indicator of a major problem. Are we going to follow his covenant or risk losing everything!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I Know All Those Words, But That Sentence Makes No Sense To Me

  Let’s say you travel back in time six hundred years or so.  Luckily, you happen across a fellow that speaks English.  Upon hearing your tale, he describes you as nice, smart, and handsome.  Wouldn’t you feel good?   You shouldn’t.  As Sol Steinmetz in his book, Semantics Antics , explains; Nice originally meant someone who was foolish, ignorant, senseless, or absurd (middle English 1300). Smart for the first 300 years of its use meant causing pain, sharp, cutting, or severe, a sense that survives in the idiom "smart as a whip.” Handsome wasn’t complimentary. When coined around 1425, it just meant easily handled; it didn’t have its current positive connotation until 1590.   You might think he said you were a kind, intelligent, good looking bloke, when in reality he said you were a foolish pain easily dealt with.   Words have an annoying habit of changing meaning over time in the same language and it becomes even more compli...
Post a Comment
Read more

Master Your Self

  In a contest for the toughest president of the United States, it would be hard to go against Theodore Roosevelt.  He was known for his “manly” pursuits hunting big game, climbing the Matterhorn, participating in boxing match while president. (These weren’t play fights, he lost the vision on one eye because of them!)  Once before he was about to give a speech an assassin shot him in the chest.  Roosevelt refused to go to a hospital and insisted on giving his speech, still wearing his blood-soaked shirt!   Teddy might have become tough but he wasn’t born that way.  He was a sickly child that suffered from severe asthma that almost proved fatal.  As was a young boy, doctors discovered that he had a weak heart, and advised him to get a desk job and not strain himself.  He was homeschooled because of his many illnesses and spent most of his time indoors.   But then as a teen his father, whom Teddy Roosevelt revered, told his son, “ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Does A Lion Tamer Use a Chair?

  Ok, I know you have seen the image. A lion tamer enters in the cage of the beast and forces it to obey his commands using a whip, a gun and a chair. Now you can see how the whip and gun could come in handy but you might be wondering why a chair would intimidate an animal as powerful as a lion? Clyde Beatty taming a lion with a chair   It's not that the lion is afraid of the chair -- it's that the lion is confused by the chair. Cats are single-minded, and the points of the chair's four legs bobbing around confuse the lion enough that it loses its train of thought. Casually put, the chair distracts the lion from wanting to claw the lion tamer's face off. The powerful creature could destroy the chair in moment’s notice but instead it is distracted into submission.  It’s not too much different than how Satan controls us today. By the power of God we could overcome anything that he would use to subdue us. We can overcome the evil one (1 st John 2:13-14). ...
Post a Comment
Read more