Skip to main content

Playing to Win or Not Lose?

   What would you cause more pressure, a shot to win or a shot to not lose? A great example of this is when soccer players take penalty kicks to settle a tie.  The odds of making a penalty kick are at 85%, for professional soccer players. So there is a high expectation that the kick should be made.   

   Imagine taking the last penalty shot for a professional team.  Which situation would you prefer?
1-Your team is down by one, and you have to make it to tie; if you miss, your team will lose.
2-Your team is tied, and you do not have to make it, but if you do make it, you will win.
   
 According to the research of Geir Jordet and Ester Hartman, when missing the kick will cause the kicker’s team to lose, professional kickers make on those shots only 62% of the time. But when making the goal will result in a win, they find the net 92% of the time.  It is the same kick, the same twelve yards every time, but there is a 30% gap in the success rate. The difference between the two kicks is the first is labeled as a threat (to not lose) and the second is labeled as a challenge (to win).  The psychology behind the kick is huge.*

   
 Let’s apply this lesson to our spiritual lives. Is our mind set to not lose or to gain? Our regret of the mistake or the chance of our success?  What should our attitude be? In Philippians 3:13-14 we read, “Brethren, I do not regard myself as having laid hold of it yet; but one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and reaching forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus”. Paul want us not to focus on our mistakes but keep looking forward to what lies ahead. This is an attitude that is more likely to bring success. In Christ, the victory is already won! Instead of adopting the negative mindset fearing loss, let’s have one that knows we win if we keep moving upward! 

*Credit Matthew Modine "Musing On Spiritual Matters" for illustration 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I Know All Those Words, But That Sentence Makes No Sense To Me

  Let’s say you travel back in time six hundred years or so.  Luckily, you happen across a fellow that speaks English.  Upon hearing your tale, he describes you as nice, smart, and handsome.  Wouldn’t you feel good?   You shouldn’t.  As Sol Steinmetz in his book, Semantics Antics , explains; Nice originally meant someone who was foolish, ignorant, senseless, or absurd (middle English 1300). Smart for the first 300 years of its use meant causing pain, sharp, cutting, or severe, a sense that survives in the idiom "smart as a whip.” Handsome wasn’t complimentary. When coined around 1425, it just meant easily handled; it didn’t have its current positive connotation until 1590.   You might think he said you were a kind, intelligent, good looking bloke, when in reality he said you were a foolish pain easily dealt with.   Words have an annoying habit of changing meaning over time in the same language and it becomes even more compli...

Master Your Self

  In a contest for the toughest president of the United States, it would be hard to go against Theodore Roosevelt.  He was known for his “manly” pursuits hunting big game, climbing the Matterhorn, participating in boxing match while president. (These weren’t play fights, he lost the vision on one eye because of them!)  Once before he was about to give a speech an assassin shot him in the chest.  Roosevelt refused to go to a hospital and insisted on giving his speech, still wearing his blood-soaked shirt!   Teddy might have become tough but he wasn’t born that way.  He was a sickly child that suffered from severe asthma that almost proved fatal.  As was a young boy, doctors discovered that he had a weak heart, and advised him to get a desk job and not strain himself.  He was homeschooled because of his many illnesses and spent most of his time indoors.   But then as a teen his father, whom Teddy Roosevelt revered, told his son, “ ...

Why Does A Lion Tamer Use a Chair?

  Ok, I know you have seen the image. A lion tamer enters in the cage of the beast and forces it to obey his commands using a whip, a gun and a chair. Now you can see how the whip and gun could come in handy but you might be wondering why a chair would intimidate an animal as powerful as a lion? Clyde Beatty taming a lion with a chair   It's not that the lion is afraid of the chair -- it's that the lion is confused by the chair. Cats are single-minded, and the points of the chair's four legs bobbing around confuse the lion enough that it loses its train of thought. Casually put, the chair distracts the lion from wanting to claw the lion tamer's face off. The powerful creature could destroy the chair in moment’s notice but instead it is distracted into submission.  It’s not too much different than how Satan controls us today. By the power of God we could overcome anything that he would use to subdue us. We can overcome the evil one (1 st John 2:13-14). ...