Skip to main content

The Response Is Still The Same

   It was a perfect sermon.  When Paul speaks at the Areopagus in Acts 17:22-31, the sermon was everything that a preacher could want.  Before the lesson, a buzz had been generated (Acts 17:18).  He had an educated audience open to new ideas, wanting to hear him speak. (Acts 17:19-21).Even the location gave the lesson a sense of importance.

   His presentation had all those things that your speech teacher tells you to add to be effective.  A great opening hook (The Unknown God), quotes from people that would respect and admire, great individual lines that would stick in your memory.  It paints vividly a picture of a powerful God that created all but is missed by man in his ignorance, a God that has been wanting for mankind to reach out to him, so he can save them from destruction.  It closes with a might crescendo, a call to change, and a reason to act.  It is simple yet profound, gentle yet challenging, respectful yet demanding. All in all, a perfect sermon for that moment.  So you would think that the response would be great for that lesson.

But the response to that lesson is the same to every other lesson.

   You see after he is finished, we see three different responses.  In Acts 17:32-34,  we see that “some began to sneer”.  No matter how good the lesson is some people will mock it, point out its flaws and dismiss the message.  The truth doesn’t fit into their preconceived ideas, so it will be dismiss with jest.

   Other won’t be so quick to dismiss but then again they won’t be quick to obey either.  We also read “but others said, "We shall hear you again concerning this."  The message did catch their interest, they saw something there but yet they didn’t want to apply it at the moment.  Like Felix in Acts 24:25, they see this message applies to them but if they act on it, it will force a change and that change frightens them.  Better to put things off and worry about them later.  It seems however for most, later never comes.  ‘Some later time’ is just another way of saying no.

   It is in that third group we see something different.  We read “some men joined him and believed,”. The message didn’t just hit their ears it hit their hearts.  They responded in faith.  They allowed the truth to change them.  The sermons became their own.  What was taught was acted upon and because so their lives were changed eternally.

   Next Sunday as the lesson drawn to close let’s think about our response. Chances are it won’t be a perfect lesson, but our response will be the same. Will dismiss the point, laugh at the imperfections in delivery and never even consider the truth therein?  Will we listen and consider but leave the message on the pew to considered on later, if later ever comes? Or will take the sermon to heart, join the challenge put before us and believe the truth we are being taught?

   How will we respond?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I Know All Those Words, But That Sentence Makes No Sense To Me

  Let’s say you travel back in time six hundred years or so.  Luckily, you happen across a fellow that speaks English.  Upon hearing your tale, he describes you as nice, smart, and handsome.  Wouldn’t you feel good?   You shouldn’t.  As Sol Steinmetz in his book, Semantics Antics , explains; Nice originally meant someone who was foolish, ignorant, senseless, or absurd (middle English 1300). Smart for the first 300 years of its use meant causing pain, sharp, cutting, or severe, a sense that survives in the idiom "smart as a whip.” Handsome wasn’t complimentary. When coined around 1425, it just meant easily handled; it didn’t have its current positive connotation until 1590.   You might think he said you were a kind, intelligent, good looking bloke, when in reality he said you were a foolish pain easily dealt with.   Words have an annoying habit of changing meaning over time in the same language and it becomes even more compli...
Post a Comment
Read more

Master Your Self

  In a contest for the toughest president of the United States, it would be hard to go against Theodore Roosevelt.  He was known for his “manly” pursuits hunting big game, climbing the Matterhorn, participating in boxing match while president. (These weren’t play fights, he lost the vision on one eye because of them!)  Once before he was about to give a speech an assassin shot him in the chest.  Roosevelt refused to go to a hospital and insisted on giving his speech, still wearing his blood-soaked shirt!   Teddy might have become tough but he wasn’t born that way.  He was a sickly child that suffered from severe asthma that almost proved fatal.  As was a young boy, doctors discovered that he had a weak heart, and advised him to get a desk job and not strain himself.  He was homeschooled because of his many illnesses and spent most of his time indoors.   But then as a teen his father, whom Teddy Roosevelt revered, told his son, “ ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Gift You Give Yourself

    I always hated buying gifts for my Mom. If I got her something like a new set of pans, it was like saying “Here’s something you can use to go make me something to eat”. A gift for her was seemingly a gift for me.   There are however gifts you give that benefit you more than the receiver. For example, forgiveness. When you give it, you are giving it to yourself as much as you are giving it to them. Jesus said that when we forgive others it means God is forgiving us our wrongs (Matthew 6:14-15).  I once read: “ Heaven is where everyone's forgiven. Hell is where nobody's forgiven.  So, when we forgive we pull heaven down into our lives.  When we withhold forgiveness, we pull hell up into our lives ” Give yourself something nice today, Forgive.
Post a Comment
Read more