Skip to main content

Young News Is Old News


  I often hear worries about the future of the church geared towards the younger generation. People will voice their concerns over the “graying of the church” and the lack of commitment in younger generations. The perception is the church is getting older and keeping less of its young people. But what do the statistics bear out?
  In recent data from the pewforum.org* tells us in general the younger generation is less religious than previous generations. However, in the churches of Christ this is not the case. In fact, the average age among the members of churches of Christ is less than the general population. The Church of Christ has about 22% of its membership between the ages of 18-29, as compared to denominational world where that percentage is between 12% to 8%. Approximately 54% of the members of the church are under the age of 50. The church will retain 70% of its children while most denominations keep only 62%of theirs.
  So what do these numbers tell us? Many today have radical ideas about what should be done to fix the perceived problem in the church. Another statistic gives us an interesting view point. Churches of Christ that by their own definition define themselves as extreme right or extreme left lose 60% of their younger people, either the world or denominations respectively. This shows us the answer is not in the extremes but rather in keeping with the core values the church has been teaching since the 1st century. If we follow God’s plan for his church, there is no need to worry about the future.

* I got these statics from Phil Sanders lesson  Why Young Adults Leave the Faith, And What WeCan Do and he credited them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I Know All Those Words, But That Sentence Makes No Sense To Me

  Let’s say you travel back in time six hundred years or so.  Luckily, you happen across a fellow that speaks English.  Upon hearing your tale, he describes you as nice, smart, and handsome.  Wouldn’t you feel good?   You shouldn’t.  As Sol Steinmetz in his book, Semantics Antics , explains; Nice originally meant someone who was foolish, ignorant, senseless, or absurd (middle English 1300). Smart for the first 300 years of its use meant causing pain, sharp, cutting, or severe, a sense that survives in the idiom "smart as a whip.” Handsome wasn’t complimentary. When coined around 1425, it just meant easily handled; it didn’t have its current positive connotation until 1590.   You might think he said you were a kind, intelligent, good looking bloke, when in reality he said you were a foolish pain easily dealt with.   Words have an annoying habit of changing meaning over time in the same language and it becomes even more compli...

Master Your Self

  In a contest for the toughest president of the United States, it would be hard to go against Theodore Roosevelt.  He was known for his “manly” pursuits hunting big game, climbing the Matterhorn, participating in boxing match while president. (These weren’t play fights, he lost the vision on one eye because of them!)  Once before he was about to give a speech an assassin shot him in the chest.  Roosevelt refused to go to a hospital and insisted on giving his speech, still wearing his blood-soaked shirt!   Teddy might have become tough but he wasn’t born that way.  He was a sickly child that suffered from severe asthma that almost proved fatal.  As was a young boy, doctors discovered that he had a weak heart, and advised him to get a desk job and not strain himself.  He was homeschooled because of his many illnesses and spent most of his time indoors.   But then as a teen his father, whom Teddy Roosevelt revered, told his son, “ ...

Until Midnight

    In Acts 20, there is the tragicomic event surrounding a young man by the name of Eutychus. He did what a lot of folks before and after him did, he fell asleep during a sermon. Unfortunately, he was setting in in the third story window at the time. So instead of nodding off and hitting the pew in front of him, he fell to his death. The good news was the apostle Paul was delivering the sermon and had the ability to bring him back.       I don’t know, however, if we can judge Eutychus too harshly. The sermon had gone on till midnight. Paul wouldn’t finish it up till daybreak. That’s a long lesson. I know some folks that might want to jump out of a window if I had a lesson that long, yet these Christians wanted to be there to hear Paul.   Don’t get me wrong, I’m not pushing for all night sermons but I think we might need to adopt these folks' dedication. They knew that Paul was only in town for a limited time only and they were determined to ...