Skip to main content

I Think You Can

  Robert Rosenthal came to teachers with a new test called the Harvard Test of Inflected Acquisition. This test he informed the instructors could accurately predict kids that would excel in the coming year. The test was administered and the teachers were given the names of potentially high-achieving students.  Rosenthal expressed to them that these kids were special and that even if they might not done well in the past they showed unusual potential for growth. 

 

The test proved itself right. Those students it selected scored better and improved more. The 1st graders gained 27 IQ points as for only 12 for the rest of the class. In 2nd grade, the potentially high achievers gained 17 points versus only 7 by the rest of the class.

  The result might be right but the test wasn’t.  Rosenthal selected the kids at random.  Nothing was different about them.

  What really changed was how they were viewed by their teachers. Instead of seeing them as average, they viewed them as special. And that viewpoint changed how they treated them.

 The teachers treated these kids kinder with more warmth, gave them more learning material, and called on them more in class. When the students made a mistake, they gave them the benefit of doubt and were quicker to presume they needed better feedback. This change in how they were treated changed how they performed.

  I think this is akin to what Paul tells us in 2nd Corinthians 5:16-17:  “Therefore from now on we recognize no one according to the flesh; even though we have known Christ according to the flesh, yet now we know Him in this way no longer. Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come.”

  Instead of looking at people in the worldly, fleshy light, we should see them in the way Christ does as one with the potential for growth. That will change how we treat others and that can change what they become! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Until Midnight

    In Acts 20, there is the tragicomic event surrounding a young man by the name of Eutychus. He did what a lot of folks before and after him did, he fell asleep during a sermon. Unfortunately, he was setting in in the third story window at the time. So instead of nodding off and hitting the pew in front of him, he fell to his death. The good news was the apostle Paul was delivering the sermon and had the ability to bring him back.       I don’t know, however, if we can judge Eutychus too harshly. The sermon had gone on till midnight. Paul wouldn’t finish it up till daybreak. That’s a long lesson. I know some folks that might want to jump out of a window if I had a lesson that long, yet these Christians wanted to be there to hear Paul.   Don’t get me wrong, I’m not pushing for all night sermons but I think we might need to adopt these folks' dedication. They knew that Paul was only in town for a limited time only and they were determined to ...

The Mighty Gulf

  It is hard to get people on two sides of an issue to come together. Each has their own viewpoint, their perceptive, their own foibles, their own understanding.  To gain any common ground there must be something in common. Something or someone that can bridge the gulf between the two.   Could there be a greater gulf than there was between God and man? How could a holy perfect God find a way to connect to the fallen, imperfect mankind? How can one without temptation connect to those who are beset by it? How could limited mortal beings understand an omnipotent eternal God?   In 1 Timothy 2:5, we read, “ For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus .” The phrase mediator here describes a person that bridges the gap, a go-between. Jesus was one who could stand in both worlds. A perfect holy one who can understand our temptations, a man who would die yet live eternally, One who was God yet became flesh and dwelt among us. ...

How Dare You!

    Lewis Keseberg was tired of all the accusations against him so he filed a defamation lawsuit against Ned Coffeemeyer the man he saw as responsible for the rumors. The court found that Ned had indeed called Keseberg a “thief and murderer” without any proof but it didn’t rule very strongly in his favor by only imposing a fine of one dollar.  Maybe they were lenient because Ned Coffeemeyr had earlier rescued Lewis Keseberg from a terrible situation.  Maybe it was because the accusations while not proven were highly likely.  And maybe because Lewis Keseberg had admitted to eating people.   Lewis Keseberg was one of the members of the infamous Donner Party, a wagon train that got caught in the Siera Nevada mountain and resorted to cannibalism to survive. Keseberg wasn’t known as a very good person before those events and they certainly didn’t help improve his image. But to sue the very person who saved you seems to define the kind of person he was....