Baptism is one of the more debated and resisted ideas from scripture.
When it comes to the pattern of salvation you don’t get many folks arguing
about the need for repentance, or the necessity of belief or even the requirement
of confessing Christ. Yet baptism is the point people resist.
Yet you
don’t see that much in the first century. As I perused the book of Acts, I saw something
else;
“So then, those who had received his word were baptized; …”
Acts 2:41
“But when they believed Philip preaching the good news about the kingdom
of God and the name of Jesus Christ, they were being baptized, men and women
alike.”
Acts 8:12
“And when she and her household had been baptized, she urged us, saying,
"If you have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come into my house and
stay.".
Acts 16:15
“And he took them that very hour of the night and washed their wounds,
and immediately he was baptized, he and all his household.”
Acts 16:33
“and many of the Corinthians when
they heard were believing and being baptized.”
Acts 18:8
“When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.”
Acts 19:5
People heard, they believed and were baptized.
It didn’t matter if they were male or female, Jew or Gentile, a group or an
individual, they didn’t delay or wait, they simply fulfilled the command. Even
those that had done a type of baptism (Acts 19:1-5), didn’t object when given
the command to be baptized in the name of the Lord.
So why do we?
The
why of baptism could be summed up in the simple statement: “we are told to do
it”. The Bible gives us a much clearer and complete answer than that, yet is numerously
commanded and often exemplified. Is that not enough?
If one
said “Why should I be baptized” you could answer “Why should you not”? There
really isn’t a good answer if one fairly considers the scripture!
Comments
Post a Comment