Skip to main content

Why The Preacher Should Not Be Baptizing



How's that for a shocking title!  Well before you think I’ve lost, it let’s consider a verse;

I thank God that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius,  so that no one would say you were baptized in my name.
1st Corinthians 1:14-15 

  Why in the world would Paul be thanking God for not baptizing people?  Baptism clearly is very important in the Scriptures (Acts 2:38, 1st Peter 3:21, Mark 16:16). Jesus commanded it, the apostles taught it and the text is replete with examples of it.  So what he doing?

  Paul here isn’t talking about the person needing to be baptized but the person doing the baptism.  Baptism requires a person to be baptized and a person doing the baptism.  Here Paul is making a point that it doesn’t require a special person to do the baptizing.   This might be a shocking statement to us but it shouldn’t.

  Jesus taught about baptism but he didn’t do the baptizing himself (John 4:1-2). Both Peter and Paul told people to be baptized but had others do the act (Acts 10:48, 1st Corinthians 1:17).  There is no  Biblical requirement for an authorized “clergy” to baptize anyone.

  Yet it seems we might have forgotten this concept.  People feel the need to ‘call the preacher” when someone desires to be baptized.  Folks might brag about the being baptized by a famous preacher.  None of that matters or is necessary!  Baptism is not about who we are baptized by who we are baptized into (Galatians 3:27).

  Whenever someone is baptized I want to know about it and be there if at all possible. It is a time of rejoicing (Luke 15:10). But as a preacher I don’t have to be there or do it for it to matter.  It might even be detrimental if it causes us to put faith in men rather than God.


  Being baptized is what matters, not who is doing it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Does A Lion Tamer Use a Chair?

  Ok, I know you have seen the image. A lion tamer enters in the cage of the beast and forces it to obey his commands using a whip, a gun and a chair. Now you can see how the whip and gun could come in handy but you might be wondering why a chair would intimidate an animal as powerful as a lion? Clyde Beatty taming a lion with a chair   It's not that the lion is afraid of the chair -- it's that the lion is confused by the chair. Cats are single-minded, and the points of the chair's four legs bobbing around confuse the lion enough that it loses its train of thought. Casually put, the chair distracts the lion from wanting to claw the lion tamer's face off. The powerful creature could destroy the chair in moment’s notice but instead it is distracted into submission.  It’s not too much different than how Satan controls us today. By the power of God we could overcome anything that he would use to subdue us. We can overcome the evil one (1 st John 2:13-14). ...

The Right to Arm Bears

  In the book of 2 nd Kings 2, we have one of the most unusual, violent and curious passages in scripture. It involves the prophet Elisha siccing a couple of bears on some kids that were mocking his bald head.    As a guy that is a little light on top that has been around some surly kids, I can feel for the guy. But seriously a bear attack? On kids? What is going on? ….young lads came out from the city and mocked him and said to him, "Go up, you baldhead; go up, you baldhead!"  When he looked behind him and saw them, he cursed them in the name of the LORD. Then two female bears came out of the woods and tore up forty-two lads of their number. 2 nd Kings 2:23-25  It might help to explore the passage a bit more. The baldhead statement: This was an identifying mark of the prophet as opposed to Elijah who was hairy (1st Kings 1:8) a jab to say you are not him. The taunt to go up: Elijah has just been taken into heaven by the Lord a sight seen by ...

The Mighty Gulf

  It is hard to get people on two sides of an issue to come together. Each has their own viewpoint, their perceptive, their own foibles, their own understanding.  To gain any common ground there must be something in common. Something or someone that can bridge the gulf between the two.   Could there be a greater gulf than there was between God and man? How could a holy perfect God find a way to connect to the fallen, imperfect mankind? How can one without temptation connect to those who are beset by it? How could limited mortal beings understand an omnipotent eternal God?   In 1 Timothy 2:5, we read, “ For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus .” The phrase mediator here describes a person that bridges the gap, a go-between. Jesus was one who could stand in both worlds. A perfect holy one who can understand our temptations, a man who would die yet live eternally, One who was God yet became flesh and dwelt among us. ...