Skip to main content

The Response Is Still The Same

   It was a perfect sermon.  When Paul speaks at the Areopagus in Acts 17:22-31, the sermon was everything that a preacher could want.  Before the lesson, a buzz had been generated (Acts 17:18).  He had an educated audience open to new ideas, wanting to hear him speak. (Acts 17:19-21).Even the location gave the lesson a sense of importance.

   His presentation had all those things that your speech teacher tells you to add to be effective.  A great opening hook (The Unknown God), quotes from people that would respect and admire, great individual lines that would stick in your memory.  It paints vividly a picture of a powerful God that created all but is missed by man in his ignorance, a God that has been wanting for mankind to reach out to him, so he can save them from destruction.  It closes with a might crescendo, a call to change, and a reason to act.  It is simple yet profound, gentle yet challenging, respectful yet demanding. All in all, a perfect sermon for that moment.  So you would think that the response would be great for that lesson.

But the response to that lesson is the same to every other lesson.

   You see after he is finished, we see three different responses.  In Acts 17:32-34,  we see that “some began to sneer”.  No matter how good the lesson is some people will mock it, point out its flaws and dismiss the message.  The truth doesn’t fit into their preconceived ideas, so it will be dismiss with jest.

   Other won’t be so quick to dismiss but then again they won’t be quick to obey either.  We also read “but others said, "We shall hear you again concerning this."  The message did catch their interest, they saw something there but yet they didn’t want to apply it at the moment.  Like Felix in Acts 24:25, they see this message applies to them but if they act on it, it will force a change and that change frightens them.  Better to put things off and worry about them later.  It seems however for most, later never comes.  ‘Some later time’ is just another way of saying no.

   It is in that third group we see something different.  We read “some men joined him and believed,”. The message didn’t just hit their ears it hit their hearts.  They responded in faith.  They allowed the truth to change them.  The sermons became their own.  What was taught was acted upon and because so their lives were changed eternally.

   Next Sunday as the lesson drawn to close let’s think about our response. Chances are it won’t be a perfect lesson, but our response will be the same. Will dismiss the point, laugh at the imperfections in delivery and never even consider the truth therein?  Will we listen and consider but leave the message on the pew to considered on later, if later ever comes? Or will take the sermon to heart, join the challenge put before us and believe the truth we are being taught?

   How will we respond?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Until Midnight

    In Acts 20, there is the tragicomic event surrounding a young man by the name of Eutychus. He did what a lot of folks before and after him did, he fell asleep during a sermon. Unfortunately, he was setting in in the third story window at the time. So instead of nodding off and hitting the pew in front of him, he fell to his death. The good news was the apostle Paul was delivering the sermon and had the ability to bring him back.       I don’t know, however, if we can judge Eutychus too harshly. The sermon had gone on till midnight. Paul wouldn’t finish it up till daybreak. That’s a long lesson. I know some folks that might want to jump out of a window if I had a lesson that long, yet these Christians wanted to be there to hear Paul.   Don’t get me wrong, I’m not pushing for all night sermons but I think we might need to adopt these folks' dedication. They knew that Paul was only in town for a limited time only and they were determined to ...

The Mighty Gulf

  It is hard to get people on two sides of an issue to come together. Each has their own viewpoint, their perceptive, their own foibles, their own understanding.  To gain any common ground there must be something in common. Something or someone that can bridge the gulf between the two.   Could there be a greater gulf than there was between God and man? How could a holy perfect God find a way to connect to the fallen, imperfect mankind? How can one without temptation connect to those who are beset by it? How could limited mortal beings understand an omnipotent eternal God?   In 1 Timothy 2:5, we read, “ For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus .” The phrase mediator here describes a person that bridges the gap, a go-between. Jesus was one who could stand in both worlds. A perfect holy one who can understand our temptations, a man who would die yet live eternally, One who was God yet became flesh and dwelt among us. ...

How Dare You!

    Lewis Keseberg was tired of all the accusations against him so he filed a defamation lawsuit against Ned Coffeemeyer the man he saw as responsible for the rumors. The court found that Ned had indeed called Keseberg a “thief and murderer” without any proof but it didn’t rule very strongly in his favor by only imposing a fine of one dollar.  Maybe they were lenient because Ned Coffeemeyr had earlier rescued Lewis Keseberg from a terrible situation.  Maybe it was because the accusations while not proven were highly likely.  And maybe because Lewis Keseberg had admitted to eating people.   Lewis Keseberg was one of the members of the infamous Donner Party, a wagon train that got caught in the Siera Nevada mountain and resorted to cannibalism to survive. Keseberg wasn’t known as a very good person before those events and they certainly didn’t help improve his image. But to sue the very person who saved you seems to define the kind of person he was....