Skip to main content

The Response Is Still The Same

   It was a perfect sermon.  When Paul speaks at the Areopagus in Acts 17:22-31, the sermon was everything that a preacher could want.  Before the lesson, a buzz had been generated (Acts 17:18).  He had an educated audience open to new ideas, wanting to hear him speak. (Acts 17:19-21).Even the location gave the lesson a sense of importance.

   His presentation had all those things that your speech teacher tells you to add to be effective.  A great opening hook (The Unknown God), quotes from people that would respect and admire, great individual lines that would stick in your memory.  It paints vividly a picture of a powerful God that created all but is missed by man in his ignorance, a God that has been wanting for mankind to reach out to him, so he can save them from destruction.  It closes with a might crescendo, a call to change, and a reason to act.  It is simple yet profound, gentle yet challenging, respectful yet demanding. All in all, a perfect sermon for that moment.  So you would think that the response would be great for that lesson.

But the response to that lesson is the same to every other lesson.

   You see after he is finished, we see three different responses.  In Acts 17:32-34,  we see that “some began to sneer”.  No matter how good the lesson is some people will mock it, point out its flaws and dismiss the message.  The truth doesn’t fit into their preconceived ideas, so it will be dismiss with jest.

   Other won’t be so quick to dismiss but then again they won’t be quick to obey either.  We also read “but others said, "We shall hear you again concerning this."  The message did catch their interest, they saw something there but yet they didn’t want to apply it at the moment.  Like Felix in Acts 24:25, they see this message applies to them but if they act on it, it will force a change and that change frightens them.  Better to put things off and worry about them later.  It seems however for most, later never comes.  ‘Some later time’ is just another way of saying no.

   It is in that third group we see something different.  We read “some men joined him and believed,”. The message didn’t just hit their ears it hit their hearts.  They responded in faith.  They allowed the truth to change them.  The sermons became their own.  What was taught was acted upon and because so their lives were changed eternally.

   Next Sunday as the lesson drawn to close let’s think about our response. Chances are it won’t be a perfect lesson, but our response will be the same. Will dismiss the point, laugh at the imperfections in delivery and never even consider the truth therein?  Will we listen and consider but leave the message on the pew to considered on later, if later ever comes? Or will take the sermon to heart, join the challenge put before us and believe the truth we are being taught?

   How will we respond?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Does A Lion Tamer Use a Chair?

  Ok, I know you have seen the image. A lion tamer enters in the cage of the beast and forces it to obey his commands using a whip, a gun and a chair. Now you can see how the whip and gun could come in handy but you might be wondering why a chair would intimidate an animal as powerful as a lion? Clyde Beatty taming a lion with a chair   It's not that the lion is afraid of the chair -- it's that the lion is confused by the chair. Cats are single-minded, and the points of the chair's four legs bobbing around confuse the lion enough that it loses its train of thought. Casually put, the chair distracts the lion from wanting to claw the lion tamer's face off. The powerful creature could destroy the chair in moment’s notice but instead it is distracted into submission.  It’s not too much different than how Satan controls us today. By the power of God we could overcome anything that he would use to subdue us. We can overcome the evil one (1 st John 2:13-14). ...

The Right to Arm Bears

  In the book of 2 nd Kings 2, we have one of the most unusual, violent and curious passages in scripture. It involves the prophet Elisha siccing a couple of bears on some kids that were mocking his bald head.    As a guy that is a little light on top that has been around some surly kids, I can feel for the guy. But seriously a bear attack? On kids? What is going on? ….young lads came out from the city and mocked him and said to him, "Go up, you baldhead; go up, you baldhead!"  When he looked behind him and saw them, he cursed them in the name of the LORD. Then two female bears came out of the woods and tore up forty-two lads of their number. 2 nd Kings 2:23-25  It might help to explore the passage a bit more. The baldhead statement: This was an identifying mark of the prophet as opposed to Elijah who was hairy (1st Kings 1:8) a jab to say you are not him. The taunt to go up: Elijah has just been taken into heaven by the Lord a sight seen by ...

The Mighty Gulf

  It is hard to get people on two sides of an issue to come together. Each has their own viewpoint, their perceptive, their own foibles, their own understanding.  To gain any common ground there must be something in common. Something or someone that can bridge the gulf between the two.   Could there be a greater gulf than there was between God and man? How could a holy perfect God find a way to connect to the fallen, imperfect mankind? How can one without temptation connect to those who are beset by it? How could limited mortal beings understand an omnipotent eternal God?   In 1 Timothy 2:5, we read, “ For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus .” The phrase mediator here describes a person that bridges the gap, a go-between. Jesus was one who could stand in both worlds. A perfect holy one who can understand our temptations, a man who would die yet live eternally, One who was God yet became flesh and dwelt among us. ...