Skip to main content

This Might Take A While…




  In 1982, Gregory Watson was trying to find a topic for writing assignment for a government class that he was taking at the University of Texas at Austin.  While researching the Equal Rights Amendment, Watson came across documentation of another unratified constitutional amendment dating back to the 1st Congress in 1789 that had been authored by James Madison.  Madison's proposal would delay congressional pay raises until the electorate got a chance to respond.  Intrigued, Watson switched the subject of his paper and researched what was a still-pending constitutional amendment, despite 192 years having elapsed. Watson's paper argued that—unlike the ERA—the 1789 amendment had no deadline within which the nation's state legislatures must have acted upon it and that it could belatedly become part of the U.S. Constitution.  His report recommended—on policy grounds—that the amendment should be ratified, as delaying changes of congressional salary would be beneficial against corruption.  His instructor didn't think too highly of his work, giving Watson a 'C', explaining that he had failed to make a convincing case that the amendment was still subject to being approved and that the topic was irrelevant to modern government.  In short, she said, his thesis was "unrealistic."

  Maybe it was “unrealistic” for that professor but it wasn’t for the Archivist of the United States, when it was certified that the amendment's ratification was completed. You see after ten years of work, he convinced enough state legislature to ratify the amendment.  His work led to the adoption of the 27th amendment in 1992.  An idea that was once forgotten and dismissed, given enough time became part of the Constitution.

  I think it is part of human nature to think that after enough time something can be forgotten about.  Promises are dismissed, warnings are ignored, and commandments are scoffed at.  When reminded of those things, there will always be those that dismiss them because they came about long ago.  Since the world still has kept spinning, they believe nothing is ever going to change; their actions will never be called into account, those old ideas are irrelevant.  This isn’t however what we are told in the word of God.  2nd Peter 3:8-9 tells us, “But do not let this one fact escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day. The Lord is not slow about His promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.”  A length of time doesn’t change the promises of God.  Rather than try to dismiss his command by citing delay, we need to realize that no matter the time, God’s law is still in effect.  Ten years, two hundred years or ten thousand years won’t keep God’s promises from happening.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Does A Lion Tamer Use a Chair?

  Ok, I know you have seen the image. A lion tamer enters in the cage of the beast and forces it to obey his commands using a whip, a gun and a chair. Now you can see how the whip and gun could come in handy but you might be wondering why a chair would intimidate an animal as powerful as a lion? Clyde Beatty taming a lion with a chair   It's not that the lion is afraid of the chair -- it's that the lion is confused by the chair. Cats are single-minded, and the points of the chair's four legs bobbing around confuse the lion enough that it loses its train of thought. Casually put, the chair distracts the lion from wanting to claw the lion tamer's face off. The powerful creature could destroy the chair in moment’s notice but instead it is distracted into submission.  It’s not too much different than how Satan controls us today. By the power of God we could overcome anything that he would use to subdue us. We can overcome the evil one (1 st John 2:13-14). ...

The Right to Arm Bears

  In the book of 2 nd Kings 2, we have one of the most unusual, violent and curious passages in scripture. It involves the prophet Elisha siccing a couple of bears on some kids that were mocking his bald head.    As a guy that is a little light on top that has been around some surly kids, I can feel for the guy. But seriously a bear attack? On kids? What is going on? ….young lads came out from the city and mocked him and said to him, "Go up, you baldhead; go up, you baldhead!"  When he looked behind him and saw them, he cursed them in the name of the LORD. Then two female bears came out of the woods and tore up forty-two lads of their number. 2 nd Kings 2:23-25  It might help to explore the passage a bit more. The baldhead statement: This was an identifying mark of the prophet as opposed to Elijah who was hairy (1st Kings 1:8) a jab to say you are not him. The taunt to go up: Elijah has just been taken into heaven by the Lord a sight seen by ...

The Mighty Gulf

  It is hard to get people on two sides of an issue to come together. Each has their own viewpoint, their perceptive, their own foibles, their own understanding.  To gain any common ground there must be something in common. Something or someone that can bridge the gulf between the two.   Could there be a greater gulf than there was between God and man? How could a holy perfect God find a way to connect to the fallen, imperfect mankind? How can one without temptation connect to those who are beset by it? How could limited mortal beings understand an omnipotent eternal God?   In 1 Timothy 2:5, we read, “ For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus .” The phrase mediator here describes a person that bridges the gap, a go-between. Jesus was one who could stand in both worlds. A perfect holy one who can understand our temptations, a man who would die yet live eternally, One who was God yet became flesh and dwelt among us. ...