In 1982, Gregory Watson was trying to find a
topic for writing assignment for a government class that he was taking at the
University of Texas at Austin. While
researching the Equal Rights Amendment, Watson came across documentation of
another unratified constitutional amendment dating back to the 1st Congress in
1789 that had been authored by James Madison.
Madison's proposal would delay congressional pay raises until the
electorate got a chance to respond. Intrigued,
Watson switched the subject of his paper and researched what was a
still-pending constitutional amendment, despite 192 years having elapsed.
Watson's paper argued that—unlike the ERA—the 1789 amendment had no deadline
within which the nation's state legislatures must have acted upon it and that
it could belatedly become part of the U.S. Constitution. His report recommended—on policy grounds—that
the amendment should be ratified, as delaying changes of congressional salary
would be beneficial against corruption. His
instructor didn't think too highly of his work, giving Watson a 'C', explaining
that he had failed to make a convincing case that the amendment was still
subject to being approved and that the topic was irrelevant to modern
government. In short, she said, his
thesis was "unrealistic."
Maybe it was “unrealistic” for that professor
but it wasn’t for the Archivist of the United States, when it was certified
that the amendment's ratification was completed. You see after ten years of
work, he convinced enough state legislature to ratify the amendment. His work led to the adoption of the 27th
amendment in 1992. An idea that was once
forgotten and dismissed, given enough time became part of the Constitution.
I think it is part of human nature to think
that after enough time something can be forgotten about. Promises are dismissed, warnings are ignored, and
commandments are scoffed at. When
reminded of those things, there will always be those that dismiss them because they
came about long ago. Since the world
still has kept spinning, they believe nothing is ever going to change; their actions
will never be called into account, those old ideas are irrelevant. This isn’t however what we are told in the
word of God. 2nd Peter 3:8-9
tells us, “But do not let this one fact
escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand
years, and a thousand years like one day. The Lord is not slow about His
promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any
to perish but for all to come to repentance.” A length of time doesn’t change the promises
of God. Rather than try to dismiss his
command by citing delay, we need to realize that no matter the time, God’s law
is still in effect. Ten years, two hundred
years or ten thousand years won’t keep God’s promises from happening.
Comments
Post a Comment